Skip to Content

TU Wien Fakultät für Informatik DBAI Database and Artificial Intelligence Group
Top-level Navigation: Current-level Navigation:

Path: DBAI > staff > Christof Spanring

Tools: Print page


Christof Spanring


photo

Address Institute of Information Systems
Database and Artificial Intelligence Group
Vienna University of Technology
Favoritenstraße 9-11
1040 Vienna, Austria
Mail mail address
Phone +43-1-58801-740-066
Fax +43-1-58801-9-18493
Room HE 03 23
You can find me in the TISS address book. You might also want to take a look at my personal weblog or at my webpage at the University of Liverpool.

About me

After quite a few years of studying a supposedly wide range of subjects (Mathematics, Jazz Trumpet, Computer Science, Japanology, Philosophy and Life) in January 2013 I finally finished my Mag.rer.nat. in mathematics at University of Vienna, specialising in logic and writing my diploma thesis under external supervision of Stefan Woltran. The subject of Abstract Argumentation seems to have caught my continued interest though, which is why I am now enrolled as a PhD student at Liverpool University, supervisors Paul E. Dunne and Davide Grossi, external supervisor Stefan Woltran, and advisors Sven Schewe and Wiebe van der Hoek.

For the time being I am mostly located in Vienna and working as a project assistant at the DBAI group, Faculty of Informatics, Technical University of Techology, in the project Abstract Dialectical Frameworks: Advanced Tools for Formal Argumentation.

Professional Activities

Ambassador for Imperial College Computing Student Workshop 2014, 2015

Research Interests

As far as research is concerned I am mostly dedicated to working on Abstract Argumentation, as its fairly straightforward definitions still provide countless open and interesting questions. At the moment I am working on Intertranslatability and Realizability issues, as well as Properties of Infinite Argumentation Frameworks.

Argumentative Issues of Intertranslatability

argumentation
© Marie-Theres Gallnbrunner

Publications

See also: [ Google Scholar | DBLP | PubDB ]

2016

[10] On rejected arguments and implicit conflicts: The hidden power of argumentation semantics.
Ringo Baumann, Wolfgang Dvořák, Thomas Linsbichler, Christof Spanring, Hannes Strass, and Stefan Woltran.
Artif. Intell., 241: 244-284, 2016.
[ web ]
[9] Perfection in Abstract Argumentation
Christof Spanring
COMMA 2016: 439-446
[ web | pdf ]
[8] Investigating the Relationship between Argumentation Semantics via Signatures
Paul E. Dunne, Thomas Linsbichler, Christof Spanring, Stefan Woltran
accepted for the 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2016)
[7] Comparing the Expressiveness of Argumentation Semantics
Wolfgang Dvořák, Christof Spanring
Journal of Logic and Computation (JLC)
[ web | abstract | html | pdf ]

2015

[6] Hunt for the Collapse of Semantics in Infinite Argumentation Frameworks
Christof Spanring
2015 Imperial College Computing Student Workshop: 70-77
[ web | pdf ]
[5] The Hidden Power of Argumentation Semantics
Thomas Linsbichler, Christof Spanring, Stefan Woltran
In Elizabeth Black, Sanjay Modgil and Nir Oren, editors, Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation (TAFA 2015), 2015.
[ web | pdf ]
[4] Comparing the Expressiveness of Argumentation Semantics
Wolfgang Dvořák, Christof Spanring
Technical Report DBAI-TR-2015-90, Technische Universität Wien
[ web | pdf ]
[3] Infinite Argumentation Frameworks – On the Existence and Uniqueness of Extensions
Ringo Baumann, Christof Spanring
In Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation. (Festschrift in honor of Gerhard Brewka on the occasion of his 60th birthday)
[ web | pdf ]

2014

[2] Axiom of Choice, Maximal Independent Sets, Argumentation and Dialogue Games Christof Spanring
2014 Imperial College Computing Student Workshop: 91-98
[ web | pdf ]

2012

[1] Comparing the Expressiveness of Argumentation Semantics
Wolfgang Dvořák, Christof Spanring
COMMA 2012: 261-272
[ web | pdf ]

Slides and the kind

2016

[13] Conflicts in Abstract Argumentation
DBAI research seminar
November 10
[ slides (pdf) | abstract ]
One of the most substantial definitions in abstract argumentation is conflict-freeness, which refers to sets of arguments where no member is attacking another. The implicit intuition for conflict thereof is that attacking arguments should not be synchronously acceptable. This intuition turned upside down asks whether not synchronously acceptable pairs of arguments necessarily are in an attack relationship. This work is dedicated to a concise investigation of relations between syntactic conflicts (given by structure) and semantic conflicts (derived from incompatible acceptance states).
[12] Perfection in Abstract Argumentation
COMMA
Potsdam, Germany
September 14
[ slides (pdf) ]
[11] Relations between Syntax and Semantics in Abtract Argumentation
The Second Summer School on Argumentation: Computational and Linguistic Perspectives
Potsdam, Germany
September 9
[ poster (pdf) ]
[10] Conflicts in Abstract Argumentation
Cardiff Argumentation Forum
July 7
[ abstract (pdf) | slides (pdf) ]

2015

[9] Existence Conditions of Extensions in Infinite Argumentation Frameworks
DBAI research seminar
November 26
[ slides (pdf) | abstract ]
As in practice neither available space nor available time are infinite, in computer science we mostly restrict ourselves to the finite cases. Be it instantiation-based databases, be it as of yet unknown reasons, be it curiosity, sometimes letting go of this restriction nonetheless is of interest. In abstract argumentation from the popular semantics only stable might crash (not provide any extension) in the finite case, while others provably don't. It is known that some semantics crash in some infinite cases. In this work we discuss examples of crashing semantics as well as conditions guaranteeing existence of extensions for naive, preferred, stage and semi-stable semantics.
[8] Dialogue Games on Abstract Argumentation Graphs
Pluridisciplinary Workshop on Game Theory
CIMI Toulouse
November 20
[ slides (pdf) ]
[7] Hunt for the Collapse of Semantics in Infinite Argumentation Frameworks
ICCSW 2015
Imperial College London
September 25
[ slides (pdf) ]
[6] Abstract Argumentation, Implicit Conflicts
Postgraduate Workshop 2015
University of Liverpool
May 7
[ slides (pdf) ]
[5] Abstract Argumentation, Implicit Conflicts
Postgraduate Workshop 2015
University of Liverpool
March 26
[ poster (pdf) ]

2014

[4] Axiom of Choice, Maximal Independent Sets, Argumentation and Dialogue Games
PhD students Tea Talk
University of Liverpool
October 3
[ slides (pdf) ]
[3] Axiom of Choice, Maximal Independent Sets, Argumentation and Dialogue Games
ICCSW 2014
Imperial College London
September 25
[ slides (pdf) ]

2013

[2] Trumpet Reincarnations: proofs from the book
Strenge Kammer: turn the corner!
Porgy & Bess, Vienna
May 8
[ part 1 (pdf) | part 2 (svg) ]

2012

[1] Comparing the Expressiveness of Argumentation Semantics
COMMA 2012
Technical University of Vienna
September 11
[ slides (pdf) ]

Awards

2015

[1] Best Reviewer Award
ICCSW 2015
Imperial College London

Valid CSS! Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

Last modified: January 16, 2017

Home / Kontakt / Webmaster / Offenlegung gemäß § 25 Mediengesetz: Inhaber der Website ist das Institut für Informationssysteme an der Technischen Universität Wien, 1040 Wien. Die TU Wien distanziert sich von den Inhalten aller extern gelinkten Seiten und übernimmt diesbezüglich keine Haftung. / Disclaimer.